In a nationalized overall health care technique, you will need to know who is who – otherwise the technique could never ever be capable establish who is entitled. The structure depends on how the method is designed and created, but with a nationalized wellness care system you will be tracked by the state where you reside and how you move in a manner that is unseen in America. The nationalized well being care system becomes a car for population manage.
If you leave the United States and are no longer a resident of the state, even if you are a citizen and could possibly retain a driving license, you will have to report promptly if you want to prevent the 13% wellness care tax. I use the quantity 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax pressure that is laid upon you for the nationalized overall health care.
Let’s say you moved and you do not want to pay the 13% tax for services you do not get, can get, or want to taken out from the tax roll. The mammoth entity has no interest to let you go so simple. You will end up getting to reveal your private life – partner, dwellings, travel, income, and job to prove your case that you have the ideal to leave the public overall health care method and do not want to pay the tax. If you have to seek an appeal, your facts could be a portion of administrative court documents that are open and public documents. As soon as you return to the United States, you will be automatically enrolled again and the taxes start out to pile up.
Public universal well being care has no interest in guarding your privacy. They want their tax income and, to fight for your rights, you will have to prove that you meet the requirements to not be taxable. In that process, your private life is up for show.
The national ID-card and national population registry that incorporates your healthcare data is a foundation of the nationalized wellness care program. You can see exactly where this is going – population manage and ability to use the law and overall health care access to map your complete private life in public searchable databases owned and operated by the government.
By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks exactly where you reside, who you live with, when you move and your citizen status including residency the Swedes can separate who can receive universal well being care from those not entitled. 頭痛 will know if you have a Swedish social security number, with the tap of the keyboard, additional details about yourself than you can try to remember. The Swedish government has taken sharing of information between agencies to a new level. The purpose is pretty straightforward – to gather health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.
It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can modify the registered information in the information. So if you want to modify your name, even the slightest transform, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry tends to make it feasible to determine who is who under all circumstances and it is necessary for the national well being care technique. Otherwise, any particular person could claim to be entitled.
To implement that in the United States requires a absolutely new doctrine for population registry and control. In an American context that would need that each and every existing driving license had to be voided and reapplied under stricter identification guidelines that would match not only information from Internal Revenue Service, state government, municipal government, Social Security Administration, and Department of Homeland Security but practically any agency that delivers services to the general public. The reason why a new population registry would be needed in the United States is the reality that lax rules dating back to the 1940s up till the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has produced a substantial percentage of personal data about people questionable.
If America instead neglects keeping secure records, determining eligibility for public health care would not be feasible and the floodgates for fraud would open and rampant misuse of the technique would prevail. This would at some point bring down the method.
It is financially impossible to build a universal health care program without having clearly realizing who is entitled and not. The method needs to have limits of its entitlement. A social security quantity would not be adequate as these numbers have been handed out by way of decades to temporary residents that might not even live in the United States or may today be out of status as illegal immigrants.